LEADING UP TO VERSAILLES, WEIMAR AND THE BEER HALL PUTSCH
To most men in the victorious Allied lands of the
West, the proclamation of the Republic in Berlin on November 9, 1918, had
appeared to mark the dawn of a new day for the German people and their nation.
Woodrow Wilson, in the exchange of notes which led to the armistice, had
pressed for the abolition of the Hohenzollern militarist autocracy, and the
Germans had seemingly obliged him, although reluctantly. The Kaiser had been forced
to abdicate and to flee; the monarchy was dissolved, all the dynasties in
Germany were quickly done away with, and republican government was proclaimed.
But proclaimed by accident! On the afternoon of
November 9, the so-called Majority Social Democrats under the leadership of
Friedrich Ebert and Philipp Scheidemann met in the Reichstag in Berlin following
the resignation of the Chancellor, Prince Max of Baden. They were sorely
puzzled as to what to do. Prince Max had just announced the abdication of the
Kaiser. Ebert, a saddler by trade, thought that one of Wilhelm’s sons – anyone
except the dissolute Crown Prince – might succeed him, for he favored a constitutional
monarchy on the British pattern. Ebert, though he led the Socialists, abhorred
social revolution. ”I hate it like sin,” he had once declared.
But revolution was in the air in Berlin. The capital
was paralyzed by a general strike. Down the broad Unter den Linden, a few
blocks from the Reichstag, the Spartacists, led by the Left Socialists Rosa
Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht, were preparing from their citadel in the
Kaiser’s palace to proclaim a soviet republic.
When word of this reached the Socialists in the
Reichstag they were consternated. Something had to be done at once to forestall
the Spartacists. Scheidemann thought of something. Without consulting his
comrades he dashed to the window overlooking the Koenigsplatz, where a great
throng had gathered, stuck his head out and on his own, as if the idea had just
popped into his head, proclaimed the Republic! The saddle maker Ebert was
furious. He had hoped, somehow, to save the Hohenzollern monarchy. Thus was the
German Republic born, as if by a fluke. If the Socialists themselves were not
staunch republicans it could hardly be expected that the conservatives would
be. But the latter had abdicated their responsibility. They and the Army
leaders, Ludendorff and Hindenburg, had pushed political power into the hands
of the reluctant Social Democrats. In doing so they managed also to place on
the shoulders of these democratic working-class leaders apparent responsibility
for signing the surrender and ultimately the peace treaty, thus laying on them
the blame for Germany’s defeat and for whatever suffering a lost war and a
dictated peace might bring upon the German people. This was a shabby trick, one
which the merest child would be expected to see through, but in Germany it
worked. It doomed the Republic from the start.
Perhaps it need not have. In November 1918 the
Social Democrats, holding absolute power, might have quickly laid the
foundation for a lasting democratic Republic. But to have done so they would have
had to suppress permanently, or at least curb permanently, the forces which had
propped up the Hohenzollern
Empire and which would not loyally accept a
democratic Germany: the feudal Junker landlords and other upper castes, the magnates
who ruled over the great industrial cartels, the roving condottieri
of the free corps, the ranking officials of the imperial civil service
and, above all, the military caste and the members of the General Staff. They
would have had to break up many of the great estates, which were wasteful and
uneconomic, and the industrial monopolies and cartels, and clean out the
bureaucracy, the judiciary, the police, the universities and the Army of all
who would not loyally and honestly serve the new democratic regime. This the
Social Democrats, who were mostly well-meaning trade-unionists with the same
habit of bowing to old, established authority which was ingrained in Germans of
other classes, could not bring themselves to do. Instead they began by
abdicating their authority to the force which had always been dominant in
modern Germany, the Army. For though it had been defeated on the battlefield the
Army still had hopes of maintaining itself at home and of defeating the
revolution. To achieve these ends it moved swiftly and boldly. On the night of
November 9, 1918, a few hours after the Republic had been ”proclaimed,” a
telephone rang in the study of Ebert in the Reich Chancellery in Berlin. It was
a very special telephone, for it was linked with Supreme Headquarters at Spa by
a private and secret line. Ebert was alone. He picked up the telephone.
”Groener speaking,” a voice said. The former saddle maker, still bewildered by
the day’s events which had suddenly thrust into his unwilling hands whatever
political power remained in a crumbling Germany, was impressed. General Wilhelm
Groener was the successor of Ludendorff as First Quartermaster General. Earlier
on that very day at Spa it was he who, when Field Marshal von Hindenburg
faltered, had bluntly informed the Kaiser that he no longer commanded the
loyalty of his troops and must go – a brave act for which the military caste
never forgave him. Ebert and Groener had developed a bond of mutual respect
since 1916, when the General, then in charge of war production, had worked
closely with the Socialist leader. Early in November – a few days before – they
had conferred in Berlin on how to save the monarchy and the Fatherland.
Now at the Fatherland’s lowest moment a secret
telephone line brought them together. Then and there the Socialist leader and
the second-in-command of the German Army made a pact which, though it would not
be publicly known for many years, was to determine the nation’s fate. Ebert
agreed to put down anarchy and Bolshevism and maintain the Army in all its
tradition. Groener thereupon pledged the support of the Army in helping the new
government establish itself and carry out its aims.
”Will the Field Marshal (Hindenburg) retain the
command?” Ebert asked.
General Groener replied that he would.
”Convey to the Field Marshal the thanks of the
government,” Ebert
replied.
The German Army was saved, but the Republic, on the
very day of its birth, was lost. The generals, with the honorable exception of
Groener himself and but few others, would never serve it loyally. In the end,
led by Hindenburg, they betrayed it to the Nazis.
At the moment, to be sure, the specter of what had
just happened in Russia haunted the minds of Ebert and his fellow Socialists.
They did not want to become the German Kerenskys. They did not want to be
supplanted by the Bolshevists. Everywhere in Germany the Soldiers’ and Workers’
Councils were springing up and assuming power, as they had done in Russia. It
was these groups which on November 10 elected a Council of People’s Representatives,
with Ebert at its head, to govern Germany for the time being. In December the first
Soviet Congress of Germany met in Berlin. Composed of delegates from the
Soldiers’ and Workers’ Councils throughout the country, it demanded the dismissal
of Hindenburg, the abolition of the Regular Army and the substitution of a
civil guard whose officers would be elected by the men and which would be under
the supreme authority of the Council.
This was too much for Hindenburg and Groener. They
declined to recognize the authority of the Soviet Congress. Ebert himself did
nothing to carry out its demands. But the Army, fighting for its life, demanded
more positive action from the government it had agreed to support. Two days
before Christmas the
People’s Marine Division, now under the control of
the Communist Spartacists, occupied the Wilhelmstrasse, broke into the Chancellery
and cut its telephone wires. The secret line to Army headquarters, however,
continued to function and over it Ebert appealed for help. The Army promised
liberation by the Potsdam garrison, but before it could arrive the mutinous sailors
retired to their quarters in the stables of the imperial palace, which the
Spartacists still held.
The Spartacists, with Karl Liebknecht and Rosa
Luxemburg, the two most effective agitators in Germany, at their head,
continued to push for a soviet republic. Their armed power in Berlin was
mounting. On Christmas Eve the Marine Division had easily repulsed an attempt
by regular troops from Potsdam to dislodge it from the imperial stables. Hindenburg
and Groener pressed Ebert to honor the pact between them and suppress the Bolshevists.
This the Socialist leader was only too glad to do. Two days after Christmas he
appointed Gustav Noske as Minister of National Defense, and from this
appointment events proceeded with a logic which all who knew the new Minister
might have expected. Noske was a master butcher by trade who had worked his way
up in the trade-union movement and the Social Democratic Party, becoming a
member of the Reichstag in 1906, where he became recognized as the party’s
expert on military affairs. He also became recognized as a strong nationalist
and as a strong man. Prince Max of Baden had picked him to put down the naval mutiny
at Kiel in the first days of November and he had put it down. A stocky, square-jawed
man of great physical strength and energy, though of abbreviated intelligence –
typical, his enemies said, of his trade – Noske announced on his appointment as
Defense Minister that ”someone must be the bloodhound.” Early in January 1919
he struck. Between January 10 and 17 – ’Bloody Week,” as it was called in
Berlin for a time – regular and free-corps troops under the direction of Noske
and the command of General von Luettwitz crushed the Spartacists (A year
later General Freiherr Walther von Luettwitz, a reactionary officer of the old school,
would show how loyal he was to the Republic in general and to Noske in particular
when he led free-corps troops in the capture of Berlin in support of the Kapp
putsch. Ebert, Noske and the other members of the government were forced to
flee at five in the morning of March 13, 1920. General von Seeckt, Chief of
Staff of the Army and nominally subordinate to Noske, the Minister of Defense,
had refused to allow the Army to defend the Republic against Luettwitz and
Kapp. ”This night has shown the bankruptcy of all my policy,” Noske cried out.
”My faith in the Officer Corps is shattered. You have all deserted me.” (Quoted
by Wheeler-Bennett in The Nemesis of.Power, p. 77.). Rosa
Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht were captured and murdered by officers of the
Guard Cavalry Division.
As soon as the fighting in Berlin was over,
elections were held throughout Germany for the National Assembly, which was to
draw up the new constitution. The voting, which took place on January 19, 1919,
revealed that the middle and upper classes had regained some of their courage
in the little more than
two months which had elapsed since the
”revolution.” The Social Democrats (the Majority and Independent Socialists),
who had governed alone because no other group would share the burden, received
13,800,000 votes out of 30,000,000 cast and won 185 out of 421 seats in the
Assembly, but this was considerably less than a majority. Obviously the new
Germany was not going to be built by the working class alone. Two middle-class
parties, the Center, representing the political movement of the Roman Catholic
Church, and the Democratic Party, born of a fusion in December of the old
Progressive Party and the left wing of the National Liberals, polled 11,500,000
votes between them and obtained 166 seats in the Assembly. Both parties
professed support for a moderate, democratic Republic, though there was
considerable sentiment for an eventual restoration of the monarchy.
The Conservatives, some of whose leaders had gone
into hiding in November and others who, like Count von Westarp, had appealed to
Ebert for protection, showed that though reduced in numbers they were far from
extinguished. Rechristened the German National People’s Party, they polled over
three million votes and elected 44 deputies; their right-wing allies, the National
Liberals, who had changed their name to the German People’s Party, received
nearly a million and a half votes and won 19 seats. Though decidedly in the
minority, the two conservative parties had won enough seats in the Assembly to
be vocal.
Indeed, no sooner had the Assembly met in Weimar on
February 6, 1919, than the leaders of these two groups sprang up to defend the
name of Kaiser Wilhelm II and the way he and his generals had conducted the
war. Gustav Stresemann, the head of the People’s Party, had not yet experienced
what later seemed to many to be a change of heart and mind. In 1919 he was
still known as the man who had been the Supreme Command’s mouthpiece in the
Reichstag – ”Ludendorffs young man,” as he was called – a violent supporter of
the policy of annexation, a fanatic for unrestricted submarine warfare. The
constitution which emerged from the Assembly after six months of debate – it
was passed on July 31, 1919, and ratified by the President on August 31 – was,
on paper, the most liberal and democratic document of its kind the twentieth
century had seen, mechanically well-nigh perfect, full of ingenious and admirable
devices which seemed to guarantee the working of an almost flawless democracy.
The idea of cabinet government was borrowed from England and France, of a
strong popular President from the United States, of the referendum from
Switzerland. An elaborate and complicated system of proportional representation
and voting by lists was established in order to prevent the wasting of votes
and give small minorities a right to be represented in Parliament. _
The wording of the Weimar Constitution was sweet
and eloquent to the ear of any democratically minded man. The people were
declared sovereign: ”Political power emanates from the people.” Men and women
were given the vote at the age of twenty. ”All Germans are equal before the law
. . . Personal liberty is inviolable . . . Every German has a right . . . to
express his opinion freely . . . All Germans have the right to form associations
or societies . . . All inhabitants of the Reich enjoy complete liberty of
belief and conscience . . . ” No man in the world would be more free than a
German, no government more democratic and liberal than his. On paper, at least.
No comments:
Post a Comment